5 thoughts on “Uninformed non-consent: “Significant COVID-19 (vaccine) risk of ADE should have been and should be prominently and independently disclosed”

  1. Extracts: Results of the study: COVID-19 vaccines designed to elicit neutralising antibodies *may sensitize vaccine recipients to more severe disease* than if they were not vaccinated … The specific and significant COVID-19 risk of ADE should have been and should be prominently and independently disclosed to research subjects currently in vaccine trials … and future patients *after vaccine approval*, in order to meet the medical ethics standard of patient comprehension for informed consent.

    There was never vaccine approval, there will never BE vaccine approval, because if there was, some one or some “ones” would have to put their name on certifying documents – legally and historically binding – for all future tort liability and historical records.

    Nah, they’ll stick with the “emergency use” authorization which allows them to do anything they want without fear of liability, making their case or checks and balances to the finished product. There will never be “FDA approval”.

    And like everything else they’ve done and imposed on us during these extra-constitutional times, their work is very bad.

    The vaccine, as dangerous as it is known to be at the intake, is designed to go in and lower our God-given natural defenses. What comes next, for those who lowered their shields? Perhaps that is why they have a curious lack of confidence, fear even, if they actually thought they were truly protected.

    What’s that coursing through your veins, into your body, your DNA, vaccinated? Any idea, at all? A Priest in Austin wants to make it a mortal sin to not inject whatever it is into our and our family’s selves. What happens, at the molecular level, Father? What can I expect, next pandemic? Do you know – you yourself, know? I’m pretty sure I do.

    Shields down. Trust us. Calm. Peace. Fire!

Comments are closed.