The Possible Fallout From an Anti-pope’s ‘Consecration’ of Russia

From an anonymous priest-friend of Non Veni Pacem.


The Holy See press office released this statement of the 15th of March, 2022: “On Friday, March 25, during the Celebration of Penance at which he will preside at 5 p.m. in St. Peter’s Basilica, Pope Francis will consecrate Russia and Ukraine to the Immaculate Heart of Mary.”

Up until now, we have had numerous false-consecrations of Russia by valid Popes. These failed attempts have been followed by the spread of the errors of Russia across the globe. These have especially been seen in the past two years of the worldwide global scamdemic that sunk the rights of nearly all humans except the elite.

So what will happen when we have another false-consecration of Russia but this time by an antipope? As Pope Benedict XVI is clearly the only reigning Pope (for he never resigned in 2013) it should be obvious to every Catholic that Pope Benedict XVI must now consecrate Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary. (Clearly, this needs to be done in union with all bishops of the world and with no mention of Ukraine.)

But many traditionalists (even some who currently doubt that Bergoglio is Pope) are saying irresponsible things like “Well, another consecration of Russia to Mary will just bring more grace, even if it’s not done perfectly and even if it’s done by someone on the throne who didn’t get there validly.” 

Nothing could be further from the truth. A false-consecration by a false-pope will not only bring down upon us the wrath of God, but it may accelerate the “errors of Russia” to a fever pitch, if not nuclear war. And when that happens, many Catholics may lose their faith in Our Lady of Fatima. Yes, billions of Catholics may end up blaming Our Lady for what they need to be blaming on Satan himself, namely, the placement of an anti-pope on the Chair of Peter who has up until now denied nearly every aspect of the Apostles Creed publicly.

Clearly, this false-consecration is planned on the feast of the Annunciation.  Why?  Because Satan always uses Bergoglio on Marian Feast days for his most severe attacks against Our Lady and the Church.  Consider the flashing of endangered animals upon the Vatican on the Feast of the Immaculate Conception in 2015 to the infernal attack on the Latin Mass on the Feast of Our Lady of Mt. Carmel in 2021.

Therefore, I call on the Cardinals of the world to depose this obvious imposter to the Throne of Peter who hijacked it in 2013 and now spews weekly material heresies. Unlike the debates surrounding the past attempts of papal consecrations of Russia, this situation is different: It is not the formulation of the Russian consecration itself that needs to be excised, but rather the imposter-consecrator himself.

Before the 25th of March 2022, the Cardinals of the world mustdepose this man who tries to make an ape of the Church, for that is the date targeted for that antipope’s mock-consecration of Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary. The Cardinals of the world will be partly responsible not only for the physical fallout that comes after such a fake-consecration by a fake-pope, but may also answer to God for the spiritual fallout. As I wrote above, the spiritual fallout for such a mockery-consecration mayinclude Catholics blaming Our Lady of Fatima for the very works of Satan that follow in the wake of this event. I hesitate even to use the Holy Name of Mary in the previous sentence with her enemy, except only to say that in the end, one way or the other: Mary will crush her ancient serpent’s head. In fact, Mary has already crushed Satan’s head at the moment of her Immaculate Conception. But we must cooperate with God from here-on-out for the expediting of the Triumph of her Immaculate Heart.

16 thoughts on “The Possible Fallout From an Anti-pope’s ‘Consecration’ of Russia

  1. And maybe we’ll get a false peace from the Antichrist? Maybe. But if Ratzinger joins in the consecration, a pope will indeed be making it.

  2. As far as i know, that the sates right to enforce death penalty is a matter of divine and Catholic faith, and Bergoglio denied it saying his predecessors were unmerciful. This meets the definition of formal heresy.

  3. These are hard matters to discuss, we all know we are speaking about things we can’t know, but Our Lady asked for a very few specific things:

    Consecrate Russia to her Immaculate Heart
    In union with all the bishops of the world

    I can’t think of anything else she asked, unless it was to specify why it needed to be done, errors, and so forth. Some say that some bishops won’t do it. I can’t, myself, see that as a problem, if they had done the consecration in 1918, and a flu epidemic kept some bishops from actually doing the consecration, it makes no sense that heaven would punish us for it. So if Marx, etc., don’t want to do it, then they will have to answer for it. I can’t see how it takes anything away from the consecration.
    Bergoglio seems an antipope to me, and more. I’d want Benedict there, even just his presence which is an indicator he approves. He doesn’t have to say a word. I doubt they will do it, because Bergoglio enjoys center stage. For him to bring Benedict would really, no exaggeration, be somewhat of a minor miracle. The Holy Spirit can obtain amazing things, and that would be.
    If the church had any awareness of anything outside themselves, they would recognize this as a moment in time when the whole world would be gazing and wondering if there really might be anything to this religion thing at all, and is it true that Catholicism has some kind of unique relationship to God…the world will be watching, people who need to be saved or go to the pits of hell, will be watching. This is an opportunity.

    They should broadcast this live, and rather than conduct themselves like the Novus Ordo clown Mass, give the consecration the gravitas that only the liturgy of the Vetus Ordo can give it. LATIN.
    Have the bishops of the WORLD consecrate at the exact same moment in time. Yes, you have to get up at 3:00 a.m. somewhere, oh well. It’s just one day, and you can go back to bed after you do it. Imagine that. Have each bishop ANNOUNCE where he is conducting the consecration, and invite the people to SEE IT, to be present at something that is a once in a lifetime situation. Imagine millions of people getting up at all hours to go to the local cathedral for a solemn ceremony that may save the world.
    And if Bergoglio starts to use his bully pulpit to talk about immigrants, dialogue, listening, have someone ready to yank him off-stage or kick the cord out of the wall to the microphone.
    Will God hold us accountable for the things that we are not responsible for, things we can have no way of influencing at all, such as heretical popes, nations who have turned away from Him, embraced evil. He did not hold Lot responsible for Sodom and Gomorrah. We need to repent, be confessed, and in a state of grace.

  4. I copied the content of this blog post (without the link itself) in the combox of LifeSiteNews’ article: ‘Bp. Schneider asks world’s bishops to unite with Pope in consecration of Russia on March 25’. It received an upvote and a reply before it got deleted (“Detected as spam”).

    1. Anyone who, at this point, acknowledges Bergoglio as Pope has very suspect credibility or is incredibly unaware. Sad.

  5. Baalam was going to curse the Hebrews but ended up giving them a blessing which took. So stranger things have happened. if Benedict also participates the “Pope bases” should be covered.

  6. Supposedly, this wasn’t done in 1960 to avoid antagonizing the soviets. So, probably this fake consecration is being done to antagonize Putin, and mock the Blessed virgin and God.

  7. I’m worried about a great deception. Francis is friends with the one world people. Say if he consecrates Russia and they make it seem like there is peace. That will cement in most Catholics’ minds that he is the true pope and anyone who does not accept it is a schismatic and a heretic.

  8. There were stories floating around several years ago that Putin had not only agreed to the consecration of Russia to the Immaculate Heart, but had requested it, and was refused. It’s just astonishing that Popes who believe, or say they believe, in the messages of Fatima nevertheless chose not to fulfill Our Lady’s request because they felt their political analyses made it a bad idea — that they just knew better. One would think they would have scrambled to do as she asked.

Comments are closed.