Across the transom from a longtime reader. In case you were thinking the vaxx mandates would only apply to the physical workplace, because the rule will be instituted by OSHA, think again. Corporate tyrants are licking their chops to jam the jab down your throat, and they won’t stop just because you work remotely. Start making plans, if you haven’t already.
This is from the CDC description of purpose for VAERS: https://vaers.hhs.gov/data.html
Also remember, it is estimated that VAERS only captures ONE PERCENT of vaccine injuries:
“VAERS is the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System put in place in 1990. It is a voluntary reporting system that has been estimated to account for only 1% ( see the Lazarus Report) of vaccine injuries. OpenVAERS is built from the HHS data available for download at vaers.hhs.gov.” https://openvaers.com/openvaers?start=30
PHOENIX (3TV/CBS 5) — Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich announced plans on Tuesday to sue the Biden Administration over an “unconstitutional COVID-19 vaccine mandate.”
In a press release, Brnovich states that the COVID-19 vaccine mandate for federal employees, federal contractors, and private businesses with over 100 employees as unconstitutional, becoming the first lawsuit on the COVID-19 vaccine mandate to be filed across the country.
“The federal government cannot force people to get the COVID-19 vaccine. The Biden Administration is once again flouting our laws and precedents to push their radical agenda,” said Brnovich.
#248: Is Benedict XVI Still the Pope?—Dr. Edmund Mazza
“It’s the question few Catholics, orthodox or heretical, want to raise. It sounds crazy at first. Granted. But if true, it has world-rocking implications for the Catholic Church: Was the abdication announcement read by then-Pope Benedict XVI on February 11, 2013, canonically valid? Were there fatal flaws in the text that would invalidate it, making Benedict the actual Vicar of Christ, and Francis an anti-pope?Joining me on The Patrick Coffin Show to tackle this—to say the least—controversial proposition is historian and author Professor Edmund Mazza.”
In this Episode You Will Learn
- The facts behind the inquiry into whether the 2013 resignation is valid
- The grave signs that Francis’ many scandalous and heretical teachings that prompted the investigation into the resignation
- The key distinction between munus and ministerium, which Ratzinger made in renouncing the latter but not the former
- A brief history of Ratzinger’s innovative treatment of the papal office and ministry
- How Archbishop Georg Ganswein (the former secretary of Benedict XVI) has indicated that the renunciation was not total but partial
- The lame and strange justifications made to rationalize the disturbing state of affairs
- Other thinkers who are actively researching the topic to force an answer to the question of invalidity of the February 2013 quitting
- Why none of this has to do with sedevacantism (the false belief that the Chair of Peter is empty)
Not sure if this is photoshopped or it really is a black-eyed demon:
By Charlie McCarthy | Monday, 13 September 2021 11:22 AM
Vice President Kamala Harris was criticized after tweeting that “protecting the vaccinated” would be pivotal in stopping the COVID-19 pandemic. Harris’ Sunday night post on Twitter seemed to add to the widespread confusion over vaccines coming from the Biden administration.
“By vaccinating the unvaccinated, increasing our testing and masking, and protecting the vaccinated, we can end this pandemic. That’s exactly what we are committed to doing,” Harris tweeted.
“Why do you need to protect the vaccinated? Doesn’t the vax do that?” former Trump administration staffer Kyle Hooten tweeted in response to Harris post.
“Wouldn’t the vaccine protect the vaccinated? I for one am voluntarily vaccinated, however mandating Americans to receive a vaccine in order to earn a living, but not requiring it to get into our country is bass akwards,” tweeted Just Tag.
“Protecting the vaccinated”???? What do you mean? Are you saying that the vaccine alone doesn’t do its job???” tweeted Marina, a Brazilian journalist.
“Protecting the vaccinated?? Are you suggesting that the vaccine isn’t the protection that it’s being presented as? If it’s not a protection, then what is it?” Stephen Kirk tweeted.
“So wait, does the vaccine work or not? If so, why do we need to ‘protect the vaccinated’? I’m not sure how people cannot see the hypocrisy. #thinkfolks,” Dan Pulgine tweeted.
h/t Miss Ann B.