Fr. Paul Kramer: “An act PRESIDED OVER BY AN ANTIPOPE will be NULL & VOID, even if the true pope participates, but does not PRESIDE AS THE SINGULAR AND SOLE HEAD OF THE CHURCH. Clearly, BERGIGLIO’S “CONSECRATION” WILL NOT FULFILL OUR LADY’S REQUEST.”

Fr. Kramer knows a thing or two about Fatima, and antipopes.

9 thoughts on “Fr. Paul Kramer: “An act PRESIDED OVER BY AN ANTIPOPE will be NULL & VOID, even if the true pope participates, but does not PRESIDE AS THE SINGULAR AND SOLE HEAD OF THE CHURCH. Clearly, BERGIGLIO’S “CONSECRATION” WILL NOT FULFILL OUR LADY’S REQUEST.”

  1. Ann’s take that if PBXVI was present at least gave a bit of hope……

    Jesus and Mary, I love you, save souls.

  2. Stop the nonsense! The second consecration, carried out by Pope John Paul 2nd. Was accepted by heaven, as stated by Sister Lucia in her book, “Fatima in Lucia’s own Words” Volume I. Yeah, yeah, yeah. She was an imposter!. Of course, she needed to be seen as an imposter, for If she is the real Sister Lucia, then the narrative evolved from the musings and writings of Father Gruner, -and others-crumble to grains of sand. Can the ‘consecration’ be carried out again? Yep. As many times as the Church wishes to do so. What of the third secret? That’s another issue.

    1. Vatican is contradicting its own narrative. Either that was the real Lucia and the consecration means nothing now, or that wasn’t the real Lucia and this time is the first time, so we are expecting something. In the first case the people of the Vatican are impious, in the second case they are corrupt.

    1. Well said. I don’t want to even think about the consequences of this circus show.

Comments are closed.